Enliven: Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abdominal Ectopic Pregnancy: An Important Cause of Haemoperitoneum and Shock
General Information

Case Report

Mehdi Soufi*1, Ahmed Mimouni2, Zahi Ismaili3, Ghizlane Soufi4, Tijani El haroudi1, and Mohammed Bouziane1

1Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of medicine Oujda, University Mohammed first


2Department of Genecology, Faculty of medicine Oujda, University Mohammed first


3Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of medicine Oujda, University Mohammed first


4Faculty of Medicine Rabat, university Mohammed V Morocco


Corresponding author


Mehdi Soufi, MD, Division of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Oujda CHU, Faculty of Medicine. University Mohammed first, Bp 4847 Oujda university 60049, Oujda Morocco, Tel: +212661212924; E-mail: drsoufimehdi@hotmail.fr

 

Received Date: 8thAugust 2014

Accepted Date: 2nd September 2014

Published Date: 8th September 2014


Citation


Soufi M, Mimouni A, Soufi G, Ismaili Z, Tijani el H (2014) Abdominal Ectopic Pregnancy: An Important Cause of Haemoperitoneum and Shock. Enliven: Gynecol Obestet 1(2): 002.

Copyright


@ 2014 Dr. Mehdi Soufi. This is an Open Access article published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Abdominal pregnancy is rare and is usually diagnosed late. It has a higher mortality rate than other ectopic gestations. Delayed diagnosis can lead to catastrophic hemorrhage. This report describes an abdominal ectopic pregnancy, revealed by a massive haemoperitoneum and hemorrhagic shock in a young woman.

 

Keywords

Abdominal pregnancy; Hemorrhagic shock; Haemoperitoneum; Emergency surgery


Introduction


Abdominal pregnancy is a rare entity, defined as the presence of an ectopic pregnancy implanted within the peritoneal cavity, outside the fallopian tube and ovary and not located in the broad ligament [1]. This diagnosis remains very challenging, as it can lead to hemorrhagic shock and death if not diagnosed and treated early. We report herein a case of an abdominal pregnancy in a young woman revealed by haemoperitoneum with a hemorrhagic shock.

 

Case Report

An 18-year-old, unmarried female patient admitted to emergency department for acute lower abdominal pain, vomiting, profuse sweating and shock. She didn?t have any history of amenorrhea. She also didn?t report any history of contraceptive use, of smoking or of pelvic inflammation. Her previous menstrual cycle was regular. On physical examination, the patient was pale with a pulse of 144/min, a blood pressure (BP) of 80/40 mmHg and with a left iliac fossa tenderness. Per vaginal examination showed normal uterine size with no cervical motion tenderness. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (?-hCG) was positive, hemoglobin (Hb) was 6.2 g/dL and White Blood Cell Count was 10,800/ mm3. Ultrasonography showed a haemoperitoneum with an abdominal pregnancy of 16 weeks, implanted on the sigmoid colic region. No gestational sac was seen inside the uterus. Despite reanimation and transfusion with blood products, the pulse rate was 130/min and the BP was 70/60 mmHg. Because of the clinical features of shock, laparotomy was performed under general anesthesia. On laparotomy exploration, about 1.5 liters of free blood was observed in the peritoneal cavity and the intra abdominal pregnancy was confirmed. The detached placenta was seen implanted over the sigmoid colic region, leading to the haemoperitoneum (figure 1). The fetus and the placenta were removed (figure 2). The uterus was normal in size and both fallopian tubes were normal. Complete hemostasis was achieved before abdominal wall closure. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. The Hb rate at discharge was of 10.3 g/dL. Contraception advice was given. The patient was doing well at 6-week follow-up.




Discussion

Described for the first time in 1942, by Studdiford [2], abdominal pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. It is defined as implantation of the fertilized egg on the pelvic peritoneum [1]. Abdominal pregnancies result from pregnancy related exclusively to the peritoneal surface. The tubes and ovaries are normal and there is no evidence of an utero-peritoneal fistula [2]. Its incidence is reported to be less than 10/1000 ectopic pregnancies [3]. In abdominal pregnancy, the fetus continues to grow following attachment to an abdominal structure. It might attach to all organs such as uterus, broad ligaments, liver, spleen, or intestines [4].

 

Many factors might cause ectopic pregnancy such as a previous history of ectopic pregnancy, pelvic infection and a prior tubal surgery [4]. Some types of contraception, such as progestogen-only contraception and the intrauterine contraceptive device are also associated with a high incidence of ectopic pregnancy when there is contraceptive failure [5]. Our patient had no history of pelvic inflammatory disease or pelvic surgery.

 

The classic symptoms of ectopic pregnancy are secondary amenorrhea, abdominal pain and vaginal hemorrhage, with a clinical picture of varying acuteness [6]. In abdominal pregnancy, the most frequent complaint is abdominal pain. If trophoblast erodes into arterioles, it can lead to massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage [7]. Having a high index of suspicion is helpful for early diagnosis especially if risk factors are present. Diagnosis is determined through serum ?-hCG levels and ultrasonography techniques [2,4]. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy is useful [4,8]. Many different agents have been used to treat ectopic pregnancies including systemic and local methotrexate, local potassium chloride, hyperosmolar glucose, prostaglandins, danazol, and etoposide. The use of methotrexate for treatment of early unruptured ectopic pregnancy was reported to be safe and effective [8,9]. Recently, some authors use adjuvant systemic methotrexate after surgery for abdominal pregnancy without surgical resection of the implantation site [10]. The preferred surgical method for treatment of ectopic pregnancy is laparoscopy [11,12]. Laparotomy is indicated in the case of hemodynamic instability as it allows rapid access to pelvic structures. Our patient had an urgent laparotomy within 30 min of her arrival and required four units of cross-matched blood transfusion. Factors such as maternal hemodynamic status, fetal congenital abnormality, fetal viability, gestational age at presentation and the availability of neonatal facilities should be considered in management of ectopic pregnancy [4,11]. Our patient had a life-threatening condition associated with haemoperitoneum. In this case, emergency laparotomy is usually required. Gaining adequate exposure and obtaining hemostasis are the key rules. Maternal mortality remains high and can reach 20% [6]. Therefore, diagnostic procedures merely serve as an excuse to speed a patient into surgery.

 

Conclusion

Abdominal pregnancy is rare and should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain with shock occurring in women of reproductive age. Early diagnosis, rapid procedures and effective management may decrease mortality.

 

Competing interest

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.


References


1. Attapattu JA, Menon S (1993) Abdominal pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 43: 51-55.


2. Studdiford WE (1942) Primary peritoneal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 44: 487-491.


3. Atrash HK, Friedge A, Hogue CJ (1987) Abdominal Pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 69: 333-337.


4. Rana P, Kazmi I, Singh R, Afzal M, Al-Abbasi FA, et al. (2013) Ectopic pregnancy: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288: 747-757.


5. Furlong LA (2002) Ectopic pregnancy risk when contraception fails. A review. J Reprod Med 47: 881-885.


6. Poole A, Haas D, Magann EF (2012) Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest 74: 249-260.


7. Gundabattula SR, Pochiraju M (2014) Primary Abdominal Pregnancy in the Uterosacral Ligament with Haemoperitoneum: A Near Miss. Clin Diagn Res 8: OD08?OD09.


8. Yeh J, Aziz N, Chueh J (2013) Nonsurgical management of heterotopic abdominal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 121: 489-495.


9. Barnhart KT (2009) Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 361:379-387.


10. Yasutake N, Tsunematsu R, Oishi H, Yahata H, Uchida S, et al. (2013) Successfully treated abdominal pregnancy causing hemoperitoneum using combined surgical and systemic methotrexate therapy: a case report and review of cases treated at Kyushu University Hospital. Gynecol Obstet Invest 76: 188-192.


11. Aliyu LD, Ashimi AO (2013) A multicentre study of advanced abdominal pregnancy: a review of six cases in low resource settings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170: 33-38.


12. Shrestha J, Saha R (2012) Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 22: 760-764.